
\begin{table}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{l D{.}{.}{4.6} D{.}{.}{4.6}}
\toprule
 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Mainstream} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Challenger} \\
\midrule
Lagged DV: Anti-elite strategy ($t-1$) & 0.427^{***}             & 0.186^{***}             \\
                                       & (0.039)                 & (0.050)                 \\
Polling average ($t-1$)                & -0.001^{**}             & 0.004^{***}             \\
                                       & (0.000)                 & (0.001)                 \\
\midrule
Party FEs                              & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Yes} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Yes} \\
R$^2$                                  & 0.183                   & 0.058                   \\
Adj. R$^2$                             & 0.154                   & 0.008                   \\
Num. obs.                              & 2546                    & 1420                    \\
\bottomrule
\multicolumn{3}{l}{\scriptsize{$^{***}p<0.001$; $^{**}p<0.01$; $^{*}p<0.05$}}
\end{tabular}
\caption{Regression of parties' anti-elite strategies on their average polling results at $t-1$. All variables recorded at the party–quarter level. Models include the lag of the anti-elite strategy indicator and party fixed effects. Regression coefficients estimated using OLS with panel-corrected standard errors.}
\label{tab:polls_regression}
\end{center}
\end{table}
